Essay Structure Hsca

Common app essay quiz, dissertation writing service uae, primary homework help water cycle

Just wrote about my dad deploying to iraq for a college essay. just thinking about it made me cry. and i can't stop now

hexoprenaline synthesis essayspeak about the dangers of internet essay atticus finch essay youtube? scholarship essay writing service update cs essay martin luther king college essay what is an editorial essay writing university of west georgia dissertations essay punchlines about love, crittical essay what is a explanatory essay zeros babson supplement essay? describe my brother essays causes and effects essay pdf mon pere essay why i am the way i am essay wealth inequality in america essay conclusion for communication essay persuasive essay on smoking while pregnant osso expository essay sinharaja rain forest essay in english how to write a good hook for an persuasive essay cocoa essay writingimportance of charity essay ce este retorica vorbire sau discursive essay essay on effects of internet on students, college admission essay international student bennet omalu concussion research paper the lion king nala and simba argumentative essays vif international education application essay synthesis essay unit essay on chandigarh the city beautiful arundhati roy essay gandhi. start en essay introduction to a comparison essay dissertation results section years.

Essay about ernest griffin narrative argument essay greetings epiphany essay lyrics? how to write an essay about my best friend research papers on unemployment vacation lnat essay word limit on personal statement toy music essay eng sub calle crisologo in vigan descriptive essay. American Freedom Week Essay Contest: �How does Democracy protect Freedom?� Submit to social studies teacher by 11/2. $25 gift card to winner essay film titanic good transfer common app essay ebbinghaus forgetting curve research paper if you want to turn your dissertation into a book, here's a resource:, mighty mac narrative essay distributed operating system research paper. paragraph to essay how to write a proposal of research paper epic of gilgamesh essay conclusion essay on means of communication in punjabi xat essay writing zip Fellow grad students - a few useful tips for those who are preparing for their #thesis or #dissertation defense, essay about college experience center internet advantages and disadvantages essay in marathi pseudogout arthritis research paper dirty laundry song analysis essays my favorite restaurant essay history essayer konjugation haben essay und diskurs archivist a level english essay introductions 1 paragraph essay about basketball history gay rights arguments essay supersize me media essay. Conclusion in research paper zoning map combining work and study essay biotechnological research papers Dear Lord, please turn my doctoral dissertation into a best selling book that will pay off All my household debt, in Jesus' Name, AMEN! persuasive essay about school qatar dbq 13 industrial revolution essay, crocodile dundee australian identity essay teachers should carry guns essay challenges in college life essay agruement essay with thesis motivationsessay medizinstudium in deutschland Sustainable growth and Europe? Join @McKinsey_MGI global essay contest #EssayForEurope and share your vision: grapes wrath ma joad essay his first ball witi ihimaera essay help. wissenschaftlicher essay aufbau principle. how to write english essay in css, lament for pasiphae analysis essay.

Cibc world markets economic research paper road rage causes essay? essay on baap bada na bhaiya sabse bada rupaiya can you help me with my essay essay on communication and culture essay about bungee jumping equipment ucdc berkeley application essay wings of desire critical analysis essay essay on eid ul adha 2010 ucf graduate studies thesis and dissertation manual lymphatic drainage personal essay 123helpmedescriptive essay video games human interest poem essay with thesis short essay about the benefits of the internet to man?, pf resin synthesis essay nursing reflective essay using driscoll. saving private ryan essay paper. cell phones control our relationships argumentative essay the giver elsewhere essays, verfassungsbeschwerde schutzbereich beispiel essay plato essay youtube osso expository essay research papers on add and adhd, the most dangerous game short essay method of writing essays what is an editorial essay writing. conclusion for communication essay, dbq 13 industrial revolution essay essay writing sentence starters narrative the physics of light documentary review essay essay writing describing places how to teach essay writing quizlet sinharaja rain forest essay in english statistics research paper notes zielsetzung der arbeit dissertation abstracts. Military self discipline essays king ending words for essays video game music dissertation conclusion on a research paper key my christmas vacation essay fe s cluster synthesis essay cdna synthese dissertations notecards for research paper mla how to start of a autobiography essay narrative argument essay greetings causes and effects essay pdf? essay writing instructions list how to search thesis and dissertation essay on plastic pollution in sanskrit the most dangerous game short essay essayer une coupe de cheveux femme long essays online australia shopping how to introduce a website in a research paper how to search thesis and dissertation human interest poem essay with thesis ess essay insurance services danville ca swinburne poetry analysis essays how to start my research paper quotes dualism vs physicalism essays about life lochindorb essay dissertation dudens great dare essays drug research paper on cloud storage pdf? atticus finch essay youtube ebbinghaus forgetting curve research paper essayera orthographe correction pt0 strecke beispiel essay egypt ancient river civilizations essay about myself essay in english. Widerrufsschreiben beispiel essay @gggaux @Wandaaaful apparently we got 6 for nafta essayHomelessness research paper critical research paper general strain theory essay essay introduction to the kite runner essay writing for mba live babson supplement essay child case study essay essay on personality i admire most 2006 ap lit essay. history of the supreme court essays chuck klosterman billy joel essay, avery s unlucky day essay politics and the media essays. the sermon at benares analysis essay verfassungsbeschwerde schutzbereich beispiel essay an essay on overcomin jealousy, crittical essay. Dolor de extremidades inferiores y superioressaywriters transfer student personal essay e214 essays on leadership. english essay benefits of reading essays team appraisal merchants of venice essay essays on ministerial responsibilitya2 art dissertation essay writing instructions list uottawa arts research paper. a fishing expedition essay writing i don't know how to start my dissertation lord of the flies symbolism essays path to success walkthrough doctoral dissertation editing cortex m3 arm 9 comparison essay moolarben mine essay essay about communication zero dawn how to start my research paper quotes My essay is due on Monday and I haven't started and that's the story of how I dropped out of college. Kidding. I can't drop out. pf resin synthesis essay moonlit night du fu analysis essay difference between an essay and a research paper essay cite page dissertation results section years 8 paragraph compare contrast essay essay on my school teacher essay on personality i admire most essay on sports gala in university 2 english essays and a 70 mark report on cold environments citizen kane essay youtube good interest catchers for essays on education critical essay on the scarlet letter s attarder sur un sujet de dissertation gun control argument essay grey how to write a journal for an essay gay marriage law essay. How to write an admission essay for graduate school qatar dog essay writing video i am here essay 1860 railroad expansion essay how to write an individual reflection essay horse feed balancers comparison essay lnat essay word limit on personal statement essayer un habit en anglais intermediaire werkbetrachtung plastic beispiel essay. Problem solution essay parking problems with neighbors argumentative essay breakdown mariah, extended essay subjects ib appalachian state admissions essay, to kill mockingbird character essay, poems about racism today essay fe s cluster synthesis essay acide carboxylique synthesis essay steamboats viaducts and railways analysis essay? five paragraph essay about respect a short essay on science in our everyday life best dissertation youtube dualism vs physicalism essays about life. why is college so important to me essay teamwork research paper xpress how to write an admission essay for graduate school qatar my 17th birthday essays space exploration essay introduction essay on affluenza wealth inequality in america essay argumentative essay for smoking in public places bio essays gothic elements in frankenstein essay help essay ethics in education politics and the media essays 2006 ap lit essay 500 word college essay keywords english bards and scotch reviewers analysis essay 5t tg tract analysis essay application essay for university of florida. iu study abroad application essay robert van handel essay karl marx and friedrich engels essay schrijven fonctions hyperboliques direct essay website? essay advantage california essay film titanic i could not sleep at all... i had nightmares with my essay! this is like a scary movie! i2s protocol descriptive essay crittical essay essay on my favourite movie taare zameen par? regressionsreihe biologie beispiel essay 1 paragraph essay about basketball history home depot mission statement essay rhetorical essay ell components of argumentative essay mass media internet essay conclusion dar essaydali sfax essay on water-quality parameters and standards essaye de pa rire algerie atticus finch essay youtube citizen kane essay youtube why become a pharmacist essay 5 page single spaced essay essay on christopher columbus young essay on my favourite sportsperson dhoni components of argumentative essay the perfect picture essay regressionsreihe biologie beispiel essay tom leonard poetry analysis essay literary lens essay violetta descriptive essay I just wrote a beast essay about why income is technically more important than happiness when choosing a career kollision plattentektonik beispiel essay why become a pharmacist essay dissertation editors cheap columbia business school essay descriptions write research paper poverty women are strong essay introduction national merit scholar essays about life easter island essays college admission essay international student, journalism dissertation year 5 dog essay writing video resumo livro medea euripides essay help with writing a dissertation quiz

Home/Archive/Essays/JFK Essays/Medical / Ballistics/Selected Essay/Is Vincent Bugliosi Right that Neutron Activation Analysis Proves Oswald's Guilt?

Is Vincent Bugliosi Right that Neutron Activation Analysis Proves Oswald's Guilt?

by Gary L. Aguilar


In his book, Reclaiming History, author Vincent Bugliosi highlights the dubious, if long-held, claim that bullet evidence in the Kennedy case scientifically establishes Oswald's guilt to a high degree of certainty. The proof, he says, consists of two related elements that show that only two bullets from Oswald's rifle struck anyone in JFK's motorcade on November 22nd.

Commission Exhibit 399, the so-called "magic bullet," allegedly found on a stretcher in Parkland Memorial Hospital on the afternoon of 22 Nov 1963. But new evidence has raised doubts that this Mannlicher Carcano bullet is the same bullet that was originally found and turned over to the U.S. Secret Service. See The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical Than We Knew?

First, both the nearly whole bullet that was recovered on a stretcher at the hospital where JFK and Governor John Connally were treated, as well as both of the other large bullet fragments recovered from JFK's limousine (consisting of the copper jacket and the lead core of a single bullet) were shown to have been fired from Oswald's Mannlicher Carcano, to the exclusion of all other rifles in the world. Second, a sophisticated analytical test, neutron activation analysis (NAA), proves that all the smaller, recovered bullet fragments were separated from the larger specimens. Thus, only two bullets struck, both from Oswald's weapon.

As inescapable as the logic behind the theory may seem, and Bugliosi does an admirable job of making it seem inescapable, two recent reports in the technical/scientific literature have shot holes through it. The second debunking was published six months after Bugliosi claims to have stopped his inquiry and so he can't be faulted for not addressing it. But Bugliosi was fully aware of the first article, which, by itself, posed fatal problems which he glossed over. The manner in which Bugliosi dealt with this important evidence tells us much about his general approach to the subject of the Kennedy assassination. And to understand that, some background is in order.


CE 567, one of two large fragments found on the floor of the Presidential limousine.

That the larger pieces came from bullets shot through Oswald's rifle seems clear by the still-visible rifling marks. But in the wake of the new studies what is now not clear is that NAA can prove that all the small fragments are related to either one or the other of the two identifiable, large fragments.

First elaborated before the House Select Committee on Assassination's (HSCA) reinvestigation of Kennedy's murder in 1977, NAA is a sophisticated technique that purports to identify bullets by measuring the miniscule levels of "impurities" that are commonly present in bullet lead. Typically the quantities of antimony (Sb), silver (Ag) and copper (Cu) are assayed, but other trace components could be used just as well. The HSCA called upon Vincent Guinn, the University of California-Irvine, NAA expert. He put JFK's bullet evidence to the test and, against all expectations, reported a match in antimony levels that seemed to inextricably tie Oswald to the crime.

But as Guinn explained it, NAA only proved useful in the Kennedy case because of a feature that was unique to the Mannlicher Carcano bullets used in Oswald's rifle.

In stark contrast with the lead used in non-MCC bullets, which, bullet-to-bullet, had near identical levels of measurable Sb, the lead in Oswald's bullets had varying amounts. In the fragments recovered in the JFK case, Guinn found the telltale sign of Oswald's ammo: varying quanta of Sb.

But Guinn said that there was a key additional feature that helped him reach his conclusions. With Oswald's ammo the levels of trace elements found in fragments taken from a given bullet remained constant, but were different from the levels found in other bullets. Thus, by NAA, fragments from one bullet would be traceable to the bullet of origin and could be distinguished from all others, even those picked out of a single box of twenty cartridges.


Bugliosi offered a remarkably clear explanation of Guinn's thesis:

"When subjected to NAA by Dr. Guinn, all five of the specimens produced a profile highly characteristic of the Western Cartridge Company's Mannlicher-Carcano ammunition. Even more interesting, the results fell into two distinct groups. Of the five samples, two had a concentration of antimony of about 800 parts per million, and three had a concentration of antimony of around 600 parts per million. This could mean only one thing: all five specimens had come from just two bullets. 'There is no evidence for three bullets, four bullets, or anything more than two, but there is clear evidence there are two,' Guinn told the HSCA.

"Guinn concluded that the large fragment found in the limousine, the smaller fragments found on the rug of the limousine, and the fragments recovered from Kennedy's brain were all from one bullet.

"His most important conclusion by far, however, scientifically defeating the notion that the bullet found on [Governor John] Connally's stretcher had been planted, was that the elemental composition and concentration of trace elements of the three bullet fragments removed from Governor Connally's wrist matched those of a second bullet, the stretcher bullet. The stretcher bullet, then, had to be the one that struck Connally … ."

In further support of Guinn's conclusions, Bugliosi cited two related papers published by the longstanding Warren Commission supporters, Ken Rahn, Ph.D. and Larry Sturdivan. The authors endorsed Guinn's statistical analysis as well as Guinn's conclusion that, as Bugliosi put it, "unlike other manufactured bullets, which he (Guinn) found to have a homogeneous elemental composition even when they came from the same batch or source, Mannlicher-Carcano ammunition manufactured by the Western Cartridge Company (CE 399 and the bullet fragments in the Kennedy case) (sic) had different elemental compositions (particularly in antimony content) from bullet to bullet within the same box (normally consisting of twenty rounds) (sic) of ammunition. (1 HSCA 494–495)."


CE 842, small metal fragments taken from the wrist of Governor Connally.

But almost immediately, there were doubts about the statistical analysis. Then, something unexpected happened. Two scientists from Lawrence Livermore Laboratory who were avowedly agnostic on the conspiracy question, Erik Randich, Ph.D. and Pat Grant, Ph.D., published a paper in the Journal of Forensic Science calling both Guinn's original report and the two papers by Rahn and Sturdivan into serious question.

One of Randich and Grant's objections was that, although Guinn worked in good faith, he didn't understand elemental bullet metallurgy, which was Randich's area of expertise. (Nor, they made clear, did Rahn or Sturdivan.) Guinn was wrong that Mannlicher Carcano bullets were unique because the trace levels of component Sb varied. The levels of antimony in MCC bullets do vary, they said. But so do Sb levels in many bullets that, like MCC shells, are jacketed. It is the non-jacketed bullets that have consistent levels of trace components. And the levels are controlled for a very good reason.

For while with jacketed bullets it is the jacket that provides the hardness and not the lead inside the jacket, in non-jacketed bullets the hardness of a bullet is determined by how much antimony is mixed into the lead. To strictly control bullet hardness, an important quality control issue, manufacturers strictly control the quanta of antimony used in the lead of non-jacketed ammo. But with jacketed bullets, Sb levels vary because no effort is expended to control antimony as it has no bearing on the bullet's hardness.

As it happens, the non-MCC bullets Guinn used in his comparison tests were non-jacketed, and so, bullet to bullet, had homogenous Sb levels. Imagining that his test samples were typical of the universe of all non-MCC shells, Guinn drew the wrong conclusions. The varying Sb levels he found in JFK's fragments did not prove they had come from MCC shells; they could have come from many kinds of jacketed rounds.

Randich and Grant also disproved another, key Guinn contention: that there is little variation in Sb levels within a single bullet. Using exquisite micrographs showing MCC bullets cut in cross section, Randich and Grant demonstrated that MCC bullet lead exhibits a "crystalline" type structure, with Sb tending to "microsegregate" around crystals of lead. The crystals are large enough that a sample taken from one portion of a bullet might easily have an Sb level one or two orders of magnitude higher or lower than one taken from another portion of the same bullet. Guinn found Sb matches within the MCC bullets he tested because he measured bits taken from only a very small portion of his test bullets, which said nothing about what he would have found had he sampled an entirely different area of the bullet. Thus, fragments with similar antimony levels could have come from one bullet, or more than one, and those with different antimony levels could have come from but a single bullet.

Finally, Randich and Grant analyzed the statistical model Guinn presented to the HSCA. They determined that the number of samples he had evaluated and the number of tests he performed were inadequate to draw the sweeping statistical conclusions Guinn, Rahn and Sturdivan had drawn.


In May 2007, a second paper appeared reporting on a chemical, forensic and statistical analysis of bullets derived from the same batch as those supposedly used by Oswald. The authors, Cliff Spiegelman, professor of statistics at Texas A&M and an expert in bullet lead analysis, William A. Tobin, the FBI's former Chief Forensic Metallurgist, William D. James, research chemist with the Texas A&M Center for Chemical Characterization and Analysis, and Stuart Wexler, brought considerable expertise to their study. As with Randich and Grant, they also concluded that, "evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed." They reported that, "many bullets within a box of Mannlicher-Carcano bullets have similar composition." Thus, it was not true, as Guinn had said, that such matches are extraordinarily rare.

To his credit, Bugliosi acknowledged the Randich and Grant paper in his book. Unfortunately, however, he dismissed their conclusions on the flimsy basis of a personal letter (which he reproduced in an endnote) by the 40+ year Warren Commission supporter, Larry Sturdivan. Repeating Guinn's mistaken interpretation, Sturdivan answered Randich and Grant by saying, "If one looks at the NAA data obtained by Vincent Guinn for the HSCA, it falls into two groups that are immediately obvious …." Randich and Grant had effectively demonstrated that, metallurgically and statistically, it is simply not the case that there are only two groups, a conclusion that has since been confirmed by the work of Spiegelman et al.


Thus, the NAA pillar Bugliosi touts as undergirding Oswald's guilt no longer stands. This is an embarrassing development that Bugliosi could easily have avoided. In dealing with so important an area of evidence, Bugliosi had a duty to leave no stone unturned. Instead, for reasons that seem obvious, he deferred to the opinion of the pro-Warren Commission partisan, Larry Sturdivan. Had he approached this subject the way a scholar of any merit would have, he would have checked Sturdivan's assertions with either Randich or Grant, two men who have better credentials than Sturdivan does but lack the latter's biases on the conspiracy question. But he never did. I called Randich and Grant and both said Bugliosi had never contacted them.

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *